Montana’s energy plan: positive plan or doomsday report?

Print Article

Recently, two reports have been released that tell very different stories about Montana’s energy future. One is optimistic, solutions oriented, and comes after a broad collaborative effort. The other was sponsored by industry and is unnecessarily pessimistic.

The first spells out Montana’s extraordinary opportunity to prosper in the inevitable transition to renewables. Released in late June by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Gov. Steve Bullock, the Montana Renewables Development Action Plan resulted from an intensive six-month effort to overcome barriers to renewable resource development in Montana. The process involved 85 percent of the owners of Colstrip Units 3 and 4, all of the Colstrip transmission system owners, renewable developers, government agencies, conservation groups, and energy and transmission experts. I was honored to actively participate.

The Plan concluded, in part, that the valuable Colstrip transmission system can remain reliable while transmitting substantial levels of renewable energy to Northwest markets. So, when the Colstrip power plant units are retired, the transmission system can remain a superhighway for renewable resources, creating new jobs and tax revenue in the process.

This was among the most important and effective electricity planning projects in my 40-plus-year career. It squarely addressed the transmission and regional market barriers blocking the opportunity to develop our abundant renewable resources.

However, not everyone sees renewable energy as an opportunity. The other report, funded by the Montana Chamber of Commerce Foundation, paints a misleading doomsday view of the state’s economy. It is undermined by two fatally flawed assumptions that drive the gross overstatement of economic impacts: (1) it considers the retirement of Colstrip Units 3 and 4 before 2043 as “early” or unjustified; and (2) it assumes the only energy that would replace the 1,500 megawatts from Colstrip units 3 and 4 would be a paltry 220 megawatt natural gas plant. Both assumptions are simply unrealistic.

A reality check on the retirement of Colstrip units 3 and 4

Colstrip 3 and 4 are 70 percent owned by four utilities serving Washington and Oregon, where customers are demanding less carbon pollution from their electricity and where they face in-state regulatory and legislative directives to transition away from coal between 2027-2030. Further, economic conditions, such as the rapid decline in the cost of renewables and natural gas, have placed serious market pressure on coal while the costs of mining and burning coal are rising as facilities age and environmental liabilities mount. This complex mix of economic conditions is also what drove the decisions to retire Colstrip Units 1 and 2 by mid-2022.

I deeply respect that uncertainty about coal jobs produces fear and anxiety in some communities, and while it may be theoretically possible to operate Colstrip Units 3 and 4 for another 25 years, it would take significant investments in maintenance and upgrades. Ultimately, retirement decisions will be based on the Colstrip owners’ assessments of economic conditions and future expectations. Such decisions will not be “early” in any economic sense and it is misleading and counterproductive to assign blame or calculate distorted economic impacts.

The path forward

The Northwest represents the best market opportunity for Montana’s competitively priced renewable resources. Montana and Colstrip workers should aggressively seize upon the opportunity to develop these resources. The Colstrip area has significant strengths, including a highly skilled workforce and a transmission system that provides an economic lifeline to Northwest markets. Combined with jobs and economic activity for plant decommissioning and reclamation of the lands that have been impacted for decades, renewable resource development can provide valuable economic development and jobs.

Montana’s energy future is bright…if we seize upon it.

Tom Schneider served on the Montana Public Service Commission from 1977-1984 and 2003-2006. Learn more about the Montana Renewables Development Action Plan at www.bit.ly/mtrenewables.

Print Article

Read More Editorial

Medicaid access is crucial to rural health care

September 21, 2018 at 5:00 am | Western News Montana’s scenic landscape has always been a treasure to its rural residents. When it comes to receiving health care, however, our rural residents face a lot of hurdles. Thankfully, Medicaid’s cove...

Comments

Read More

I-186 will hurt Montana’s economy

September 21, 2018 at 5:00 am | Western News Out-of-state environmental groups are using litigation as a tool to stop future mining in our state and I-186 does nothing but make it easier for them to do just that. What these misleading, out-o...

Comments

Read More

Trust our experts and support I-186

September 17, 2018 at 9:54 am | Western News By TOM REED Just west of our little ranch on North Willow Creek lies a town that once burst at the seams with mines and miners. Pony, Montana, boasted 5,000 people, banks, bars, schools, churches an...

Comments

Read More

Five Montana mayors support I-186

September 14, 2018 at 5:00 am | Western News (Editor’s note: This letter was previously attributed to Tom Reed of Trout Unlimited in error. Read Tom Reed’s letter here.) To the editor: Not just one, but many, rivers run through Montana. The...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(406) 293-4124
311 California Ave.
Libby, MT 59923

©2018 The Western News Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X